Worked examples
Real prompts, real outputs, and honest notes on what was edited before use. This is what effective AI-assisted teaching looks like in practice.
Each example below shows the prompt used, an extract of the AI output, and a note on what was changed before the resource was used in class. The point is not that the AI got it right first time — it is that the combination of AI drafting and teacher review produces something good, quickly.
Retrieval starter — the French Revolution
A five-question starter generated in two minutes and used the following class with one edit.
Feedback comment bank — personal essay
Eight reusable feedback comments generated from the Leaving Certificate personal essay assessment criteria, edited slightly for tone.
Differentiated activity — the water cycle
A three-level version of the same task, produced in one prompt and used without edits.
The pattern across every example
Looking at these examples, the same pattern holds. The AI handles structure, language, and first drafting. The teacher reads, reviews for subject accuracy and pedagogical fit, makes small adjustments, and uses it. The total time is a fraction of drafting from scratch, and the quality — after teacher review — is high.
The key habit is the review step. Not accepting the output uncritically, but not rewriting it from scratch either. Read it as a professional, fix what needs fixing, use what is good.